Choosing the right label maker can be a daunting task, especially with the wide array of options available. This detailed comparison focuses on two popular contenders: the DYMO LabelManager 160 and the Brother PT-P110. Both are handheld devices offering ease of use and reliable performance, but subtle differences in design, features, and label quality ultimately determine which model best suits your individual needs. This review delves into a comprehensive analysis, examining aspects from power and interface usability to print quality and the long-term durability of their respective label tapes.We'll explore the nuances of each device, comparing their keyboard feel, display clarity, tape loading mechanisms, and navigation systems. A critical examination of OEM and generic label tape quality will also be presented, highlighting differences in texture and overall finish. By the end of this comparison, you'll have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of both the DYMO LabelManager 160 and the Brother PT-P110, empowering you to make an informed decision based on your specific requirements and priorities.
Pros And Cons
- Easier to read display from an angle
- Better controls
- Smaller screen
- Labels are smoother
- Can adjust the number of copies
- Display harder to read from an angle
- No caps lock
Read more: Top 10 Best Label Printers 2018: A Detailed Review
Design and Build Quality
Both the DYMO LabelManager 160 and the Brother PT-P110 label makers utilize either six AAA batteries or an optional power supply (sold separately). The DYMO boasts a rubberized keyboard, providing a tactile feel during operation. In contrast, the Brother's keys feel more solid and individual.

The display on the DYMO is a simple LCD screen with manual cut controls and intuitive menus. The Brother's interface also features a LCD display with similarly accessible controls, including a power button and clear layout. Both devices include a sample label tape to get started.

Tape Loading and Operation
Loading the tape into the Brother P-touch involves removing the entire back cover to access the battery compartment and tape cassette. This contrasts with the DYMO, which features separate doors for the battery and tape cassette for easier access.

Both machines easily connect to a universal power adapter. Once powered on, the Brother machine offers straightforward navigation with easy font and color adjustments. While the DYMO's display might initially present some challenges regarding readability at certain angles, adjusting the contrast resolves this issue.

Print Quality and Features
The print quality of both machines is excellent, producing sharp and clear labels. The Brother P-touch allows the user to specify the number of copies desired, while the DYMO doesn't offer this feature. Both label tapes exhibit a laminated finish for added durability.

The Brother's display contrast can be adjusted, improving readability at various angles. The DYMO offers additional customization options, such as selecting label lengths and decorative fonts, although navigating these settings might require some familiarity with the device's interface.

Label Tape Comparison: OEM vs. Generic
A direct comparison between the DYMO OEM labels, Brother P-touch OEM labels, and generic Chinese knock-offs reveals some key differences. The Brother P-touch OEM labels, and even its generic counterparts, showcase a noticeably smoother finish compared to the DYMO OEM and generic tapes.

While the DYMO OEM labels present a similar level of quality to the Brother P-touch OEM labels, the generic DYMO tape is noticeably rougher. The Brother P-touch generic tape is smoother than the DYMO generic, suggesting a higher level of consistency in manufacturing quality for the Brother brand.

Conclusion and Recommendations
Overall, both the DYMO LabelManager 160 and the Brother PT-P110 are capable label makers. The Brother P-touch offers slightly better print quality and more consistent label tape quality, even with generic brands. The DYMO, however, is easier to read from an angle due to its larger and simpler interface.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual needs and preferences. For users prioritizing ease of use and a larger display, the DYMO might be preferred. Those who value superior label quality consistency and a wider range of features would favor the Brother P-touch. Further long-term testing in various conditions is needed to definitively assess the ultimate durability of each brand and type of label.
